Didn't Like George Perez on "Superman"? Don't Blame Him!

[CyberLord]

"I became very frustrated," Perez added, explaining that there were basic questions about the character's new status quo that DC editorial couldn't answer for him. "Are the Kents alive? What's his relationship with all of these characters? Who exists? And DC couldn't give me answers. (emphasis mine.) I said, 'Oh, my gosh. You're deciding all these things and you mean even you don't know what's going on in your own books?"
Full story at link below.
http://www.comicsalliance.com/2012/0...rience-new-52/

[Whune]

urgh.

this is depressing that such silliness goes on at such a big publishing house.
and by silliness I'm referring to the nonsense the editors were pulling.

Having idiotic ideas for plot direction is one thing
changing them back and forth mid story arc is just...
yeah.

[Johnny Blaque]

It was a weird idea to have that title in the first place. If they were trying to come up with a all new Super-man it would be best to have one unified direction. Having two titles set 5 years apart with the writer who blows deadlines and has other eccentricities on the origin book didn't seem like a good idea.

[NickRocks]

Man, it's pretty sad to hear these stories, and with the internet, it feels like Im reading them more and more often.