Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Why are the votes public?

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Why are the votes public?

    I never asked that and always wondered why the votes are public. Wouldn't it make more sense to not know who voted so people are more apt to vote unbiased. I mean i trust everyone does vote truthfuly, but i can't imagine there aren't any instances when people may sway their votes. No big deal though, i still think regardless that the votes always favor the "true" winner 99% of the time. I just never knew why we were required to check off public voting. thanks guys and keep those gloves up
    Art Blog l DeviantArt l twitter
    PUMMEL stats: 16 wins | 3 losses | 9 KOs

  2. #2
    PUMMEL Mod [SUPPORTER]
    [Moderator]
    Juggertha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Seoul, Korea
    Posts
    8,103
    We've had cases in the past where ppl have created dummy accounts to pad their vote. The public vote is one way to check on that.
    My Deviant Art page
    My PUMMEL stats
    PUMMEL stats: 56 wins | 49 losses | 30 KOs
    2 Time Heavyweight Champion
    Light Heavyweight Commissioner

  3. #3
    Runs with Scissors [Moderator]
    [Administrator]
    dfbovey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Alexandria
    Posts
    17,180
    Blog Entries
    1
    Might be worth revisiting public votes now that you need 50 posts on the forum to vote. That restriction basically put an end to people creating accounts to pad their vote count.
    See my work on the Game of Thrones season 2 Bluray features "Legends and Lore"
    My Deviant Art Page
    Facebook

    PUMMEL Statistics: Wins: 22 Losses: 3 Knockouts: 15
    Six Time Heavyweight Champion - Original Tournament Winner - 5 Time Hall of Fame inductee

  4. #4
    That and voting for yourself, which is just bad form.
    evErywhErE I walk...thErE's a brEEze..
    My Webcomic: VILLAIN
    http://thebreeze.deviantart.com
    Art Blog
    PUMMEL stats: wins 20 | losses 16 | KOs 4

    2B
    XBOX LIVE: thebreeze030

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    oregon
    Posts
    914
    i think it just reflects the critique attitude of this forum. Half of this forum is learning how to take a critique and half is having the courage to give one. I think the public vote just adds to the general integrity of the forum. If you are asked to explain yourself there is absolutely no harm in that. I would say that questioning a crit, or a vote should be almost encouraged if you find it questionable. All critical thinking being welcome whether it is accepted/agreed with or not.
    Qui docet, discit.
    Socratic method: Conflict breeds creativity.
    http://justisberg.daportfolio.com/

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •