Possible Pummel

[ajkarp]

This may or may not be my monthly contender. I'm trying for a lurid 60's book cover.
Crits welcomed.

[ajkarp]

Alrighty then. What I was trying to emulate Was the sexually suggestive opening credits from the 60's as well as the lurid book covers from the same era. The loosely rendered female figures are purposely rendered like that to represent fluidity.

[tudore]

In terms of composition, everything is placed well.

Your dance pose seems very stiff, and her legs are too widely spaced. The recumbent figure's stomach seems to long, and her breasts appear to be floating as if she's falling or underwater. The face is inconsistent: the blending on the cheek is quite good, but the area around the eyes, and the whole right side of the face (especially the jawline aren't) are problematic. The eyes are too bright, and the jawline is too distinct. The light is too diffuse on the right side of the face.