PDA

View Full Version : State Of The Medium Address



sdowner
02-14-2007, 09:16 PM
Ok, I'm not so much a rabid fanboy like many here, so maybe I shouldn't be the one to bring this up. But here I am, nonetheless.

What's the deal with superheroes today?
It seems like superheroes- and by superheroes, I'm referring pretty much just to Marvel & DC now- have become very rote & boring lately. Why?
In reading comics, I get the feeling that the superheroes I love, like Superman, Batman, Spider-Man and others have... well, run their course. Like despite all the hype of their various Infinite Crises, War Games, Civil Wars and whatnot, the characters aren't changing in ways that are interesting. Why is this?

As an (admittedly recent) member of the comics creators & readers community, I get the impression that there's a surge to the older days of comics, when the characters were actually developing and the creators were doing things that hadn't been done. Others are leaving the venerable publishing houses and seeking alternative fare from newcomers like Devil's Due or Image Comics. Why?

I might be torn limb from limb for this statement, but may I venture that perhaps characters like Batman and Superman have... well, had their time? That they might be better off gone from comics, for the most part? I know, it seems like complete foolishness but it may be a good thing.

Think about it.
If the characters that have been developed, have had their day, and have seen better days are laid to rest, it will force creators to do something NEW. They can't count on their fanboys who grew up reading Batman to buy their work because they like to complain about how he's being butchered. They will have to explore and develop new characters.

You say, it would be suicide for the publisher to kill off their stable of characters. Maybe. But they don't have to go too far for new material. Look at the Incredibles, from Pixar. In everything but name, it's a Fantastic Four movie. But it's also something completely new. That's what I'm suggesting. Kill off the stale, bland characters who've had their day and replace them with someone younger, fresher, yet... familiar all the same.

Look at Image Comics' Invincible. He's a newcomer to the superhero scene, and yet he wouldn't seem at all out of place sitting around the Justice League table.
Look at All-Star Superman. When Grant Morrisson was given free rein with the character and ignored all previous continuity, he made what HE thought Superman should be and has given the comics reader a gem. Look at Nextwave. When Warren Ellis took characters that nobody wanted, and that had almost no established history he created something wonderful, silly and above all FRESH.

So I say, let the sidekicks grow up. Let the third and fourth-stringers have their lives and make THEM the top dogs.
Let Batman die. Let Tim Drake grow into the cowl of The Dark Knight. But kill off the Joker, and Two-Face, and the others and let the kid make the character his own.

Marvel did this in a sense with their Ultimate series, and it's worked great for the most part because even if you take away the costume, or the ring, or the haircut, or the cape, the things a superhero stand for are unchanged. There will always be a need for someone to save us. There will always be a little boy in an alley, crying for his family.

The archetypes are what we identify with- or wish to identify with- in heroes, I think; and the way the principles of justice, freedom, equality and compassion are filtered through the individual characters' lives are what is so compelling in comics.
The classics of the genre come when a writer and artist remember that, but when some characters have become so well-defined, and developed to the point that further development contradicts what's come before- well, it's time to move on.

I'd miss Batman as much as anybody else. But if those who still have so much potential and such weight as supporting characters are allowed to fully come into their own by the removal of those who've been around for 70 years and have nothing new to say, I for one would be happy to allow that.

Plus, we'd always have the old stuff in boxes in our closets.

Maybe I'm full of crap. Maybe I should read more comics before I make these judgments. But I want to throw this idea out to people with more experience in the current monthly superhero book market and see what they have to say.

So loose the opinions and please don't let this degenerate into a thread where we whine about how this writer did this to your favorite character and should thus be cast into the street upon his tuckus.

–Steve-O

Juan2.0
02-14-2007, 09:32 PM
They'll never kill off the big guns...those are cash cows! :)

sdowner
02-14-2007, 09:42 PM
I know that.
But I'm not asking if they WILL, I'm asking if they SHOULD.

shoryukenmaster
02-15-2007, 11:57 AM
I think the problem with comics is that it's a never-ending story. Which is a paradox. It's impossible to have a never-ending story, because you have to have an beginning, middle and end to stories. All we have in comics is sub-plots leading to new sub-plots, and they usually contradict each other at that. The protagonist is never in any real peril and most of the antagonist aren't either. So I think that's where this since of staleness comes from. How can we get excited or nervous or sad when we know at the end of it, they will make it, even if they "died"? If they were to make it more like Walking Dead where no character is safe then you start to have a very real since of urgency in each of the comics.

Should they start killing off people and progressing the universe? It all depends on how they handle it. I don't want anyone else to be batman except bruce wayne. It just doesn't make sense to me to have someone else do it. Would I eventually get used to it? Probably. But would I ever feel the same love for that character? Probably not. Part of what makes these characters so great is what makes them them. If they're going to kill a character...actually kill the character. There are no takebacks, no alternate universe that they escaped to, or somebody taking their place. It should be the way death really is, final. And all the support characters and cast would have to deal with it or they story is simply over.

Now this does hold the possibility of scaring readers away, but maybe people will start to branch out and say that was really good, I'd like to read something else along those lines and search for a new comic. Instead of getting burnt out on a repeating story like we do now. Eventually saying, "You read one comic, you've read'em all."

In the end, it would be weird to walk into a comic shop and not see these the usual main titles lining the shelves, but it's not to say that they couldn't go back and tell pieces of their lives that were untold. And seeing fresh comic heroes with their own stories to tell would be a great thing.

That's my two cents anyways.

dfbovey
02-15-2007, 12:40 PM
I think the problem with comics is that it's a never-ending story.

This is why I only go out and buy trade paperbacks or mini series runs anymore. I like my stories to have a resolution and comics just seem to go on and on and on... most of the time, rehashing the same stuff over and over again.

It's easy to get bored.

Chris Major
02-15-2007, 04:02 PM
This is why I only go out and buy trade paperbacks or mini series runs anymore. I like my stories to have a resolution and comics just seem to go on and on and on... most of the time, rehashing the same stuff over and over again.

It's easy to get bored.

Amen. I do the same. Well, except for Exiles. Those I buy (in TPB form) as an ongoing thing.

I personally think that all good things must come to an end in order for the story to have sense. For instance, there are 3 issues to go before Terry Moore's Strangers in Paradise end. I'm really, really sad about this, but every story has an ending to tell, and I accept that. It's what makes it a story to begin with.

The answer to your question is two-fold: money and lack of creativity. The big companies don't want sensitive artistes to handle their books, they want ruthless, fast and efficient people who will put out a product monthly to keep them at the top. At this junction they're not in it for the medium or the art or anything else, they're in it for the money, because they have stamped out a very good business out of it and they have to keep it coming. hey don't want to come up with new origin stories for new people over and over again, or even create new universes for their characters.

You'll never see Batman or Superman or Spiderman or even Spawn die once and for all, because they're now icons of North American culture. Along with that comes licensing, media hype, exposure and, of course, the all-mighty dollar.

I'm a big fan of the end of the story. For someone like me, David Mack could've finished Kabuki at the end of his Circle of Blood arc and I would've been happy. I'd be happy if there were no more Avengers. Colossus coming back from the dead pissed me off. It's that simple.

If instead of an end of story I can settle for a stable, non-comic-book death, I'll take that. And I can't even get it! For Christ's sake, they brought back Jason Todd and Bucky. Is nothing sacred anymore?